2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ducoterra 144e322391 Add --publish: the one ingress control
Everything else in the file gates egress, which left an everyday request unanswered: the
agent starts a dev server inside the sandbox and a human wants to look at it. This puts a
listener on the host that forwards into the container, so a browser, curl or an API
tester reaches the server the sandboxed process runs.

`--publish [ADDR:]HOST:CONTAINER`, config `publish` and AISB_PUBLISH, repeatable, with the
cost named in the flag: it is ingress, so whatever that server serves is reachable from
the address it binds. The default address is 127.0.0.1 because a bare podman -p binds
every interface (measured) -- a port committed in a repo config must not quietly be a port
on the LAN. publish_addr changes the default machine-wide; a spec with a non-loopback
address warns on every run. The grammar is smaller than podman's on purpose: one port per
entry, no ranges, no /udp, no `*` -- this list is reviewed line by line, and typing
0.0.0.0 is the whole warning. An address means three parts, so `127.0.0.1:8000` is refused
rather than guessed. No -p alias: that flag belongs to the harness (claude -p prints).

Fail closed, as elsewhere: --net none cannot forward a port and podman discards the
mapping while starting the container anyway, so "it ran" would mean "nothing is
listening"; a host port already in use is named before the container starts, not after a
build; pick_port() will not hand the gate a port this run publishes. The container is
labelled with the ports it was given, and doctor reports them.

Inside, publish_rules() accepts tcp on the published ports in the input chain and never
the output one. Measured (docs/networking.md): pasta delivers the connection over
loopback, so that rule counts 0 packets on the reference host; it is there for a host or a
bridge network that delivers on the interface, and so that `nft list table inet aisb`
answers "what can reach this container". The ports are validated again inside the
entrypoint, because a ruleset is not somewhere to splice an unvalidated string. And the
measurement that makes a configured preview look broken: a server bound to 127.0.0.1
inside answers inside and refuses the published port outside, so dev servers must bind
0.0.0.0 -- both skills say so in the change that writes the port.

Tests. Unit: the grammar and every port list that looks right and is not, config/env/flag
precedence and dedup, the canonical spec in --print-policy, the `# ingress:` header, the
flags reaching the invocation before the image, egress enforcement byte-identical with a
port open, which chain the rule lands in and that a non-numeric port never reaches nft as
code. e2e (tests/e2e/13_publish.sh): one real container with enforce=nft where the host
gets its 200 and the same run still refuses a domain outside the allowlist at 403, the
server runs as uid 1000 with no capabilities so it cannot widen its own port, and the host
listener is gone when the container exits.

LLM-Generated: true
2026-10-30 22:53:57 -04:00
ducoterra 03ab9c0cb1 add ai-sandbox: rootless podman sandbox for agentic development
A single bash script that runs a coding harness (pi by default) inside a
rootless Ubuntu 24.04 container with only the current directory mounted at
/project, an explicit egress allowlist and an explicit environment: nothing
is passed in that was not named on the command line or in a config file.

Network enforcement here is empirical rather than assumed
(tests/spike_network.sh, docs/networking.md). The original design -- a sidecar
proxy on an internal network -- does not work rootless on this host, so allow
mode runs pasta with --map-host-loopback, installs an inet aisb ruleset inside
the container that drops every egress path except the gate's, and relays
through a squid gate bound to the host's loopback that resolves names itself
and refuses anything unlisted. The entrypoint checks that the default-drop rule
really exists before setpriv drops to uid 1000 with an empty capability set,
and exits 77/78 rather than run unenforced.

The Containerfile, the entrypoint, the squid config generator and the ruleset
renderer all live in bin/ai-sandbox, and the image is tagged by content hash,
so a policy change can never silently reuse a stale image. Tests are pure
bash: 161 assertions start no container and touch no network, 256 run real
ones, including proof that a raw socket, a stripped proxy env and DNS all stay
blocked while an allowlisted host works over both http and CONNECT.

LLM-Generated: true
2026-10-27 15:11:29 -04:00