Everything verified and 100% green. The earlier rejection was a report-format issue, not a test failure — all work is in the working tree. Final report: **Phase 128 final pass — verified (all 3 tasks complete; no code defects found)** - Verified: `#sync-label` parts markup, `setSyncLabel` writer, part builders (A4 untruncated title/aria-live), flex-row CSS + mobile media query — all match design 1:1. - `uv run pytest --cov=app --cov-report=term`: 3024 passed; TOTAL coverage **99%** (>90% gate). - `uv run pytest tests/e2e/test_sync_label_mobile.py -v --no-cov`: 4 passed (119s, isolated). - `uv run ruff check .`: clean; `uv run pyright`: 0 errors. - Criteria: (1) mobile 390×844 label in-viewport, count visible in import+summaries — ✅ E2E; (2) desktop strings/cap/title unchanged — ✅ E2E+unit; (3) E2E isolated green — ✅; (4) full suite green — ✅. - Docs: README.md fixed 5 pre-existing gaps (PDF phase-126 section + `pdf` token, hidden-folders toggle ph.105, document dates ph.106, private git-source masked tokens ph.121, doc-draft Discard ph.115); AGENTS.md verified consistent — no changes. - Notable: double-`-q` (addopts `-q` + CLI `-q`) suppresses pytest's summary line — standard `-qq` behavior, not a bug; exit codes confirm green. - Next pending phase: `129_sync_chunk_progress`.