"""Unit: schema boundary caps for the saved-chat surface (phase 83, task 01).

The first schema-boundary suite: every A1 cap in ``app/schemas.py`` is
pinned at BOTH boundaries — a value exactly at the cap validates and one
past it raises a pydantic ``ValidationError`` naming the offending field
(the 422-shaped boundary response, house style, phase 56 precedent).
Plus the regression pin: a realistic ``bor.chat.v1`` payload validates
cleanly and round-trips ``model_dump()`` (the stored-shape contract —
the caps added value bounds only, no key/shape change).

Phase 164 (task 01, locked A1) re-cuts the long-answer chain —
``HistoryTurn.text``/``.thinking``, ``ChatMessage.text``/``.thinking``
and the thinking-segment cap to 600 000 (a FULL-cap answer at
``BOR_MAX_OUTPUT_TOKENS=131_072``, ≈ 524 300 chars), the history list
to 500 and the saved-messages list to 500, and adds the ONE new bound:
the ``SavedChatCreate``/``SavedChatUpdate`` total-character budget
(8 000 000) that keeps the anonymous SEC-05 surface bounded now that a
single message may hold a full-length answer. The chat-path caps are
pinned here too (``HistoryTurn`` + ``ChatRequest.history``) — same
boundaries as the saved-chat mirror, and the 422 ``detail`` SHAPE a cap
rejection produces is pinned as the server-side half of the phase-164
serializer contract (a LIST OF OBJECTS — the live ``[object Object]``
report).

Phase 189 (task 01, A1 — the owner incident of 2026-10-16) moves the five
LIST caps from the round-cap-10 era to the real agent configuration
(``sources``/``related``/``tools`` 200, ``suggestions`` 100, ``segments``
450): the cited tier is the agent's READ docs (``merge_cited_docs``,
phase 119), so its size follows ``BOR_AGENT_MAX_ROUNDS`` (production 50,
the validator unbounded above), and a 22-source done frame used to 422
its own auto-save. The character caps are UNCHANGED; the incident payload
(22 sources / 33 tools / 40 segments) joins the round-trip pins.
"""
from __future__ import annotations

from typing import Any

import pytest
from pydantic import ValidationError

from app.schemas import (
    SAVED_CHAT_TOTAL_CHARS_BUDGET,
    ChatMessage,
    ChatRequest,
    ChatSegment,
    ChatThinkingSegment,
    ChatToolSegment,
    HistoryTurn,
    SavedChatCreate,
    SavedChatUpdate,
    SourceRef,
    ToolCall,
    VerbatimBlockRef,
)

# --- boundary constants (phase 83, A1 — mirror sources in app/schemas.py) ---

#: Phase 164 (locked A1): 32 000 → 600 000. ONE constant for the whole
#: mirror — ``HistoryTurn.text``/``.thinking`` (the chat path),
#: ``ChatMessage.text``/``.thinking`` and the ``segments`` thinking
#: entry: the identical-boundary test IS the proof the phase-83 mirror
#: invariant survived the raise (raise one side and these pins fail).
#: 600 000 ≈ a full-cap answer at ``BOR_MAX_OUTPUT_TOKENS=131_072``
#: (≈ 524 300 chars at ~4 chars/token) with margin.
TEXT_CAP = 600_000
#: Phase 189 (A1, owner incident 2026-10-16): the list caps move from the
#: round-cap-10 era to the real configuration. The cited tier is the
#: agent's READ DOCS since phase 119 (``merge_cited_docs``), so its size
#: follows ``agent_max_rounds`` (production ``BOR_AGENT_MAX_ROUNDS=50``,
#: the validator unbounded above) — 200 is 4× that cap. A 22-source done
#: frame used to 422 its own done-time auto-save (the incident).
SOURCES_CAP = 200
#: The related-doc tier — the same ``SourceRef`` family, the same cap
#: (``related_max_docs`` is owner-tunable with no upper bound).
RELATED_CAP = 200
#: 20× the ``suggested_docs`` default of 5 (also tunable unbounded above).
SUGGESTIONS_CAP = 100
CHIP_CAP = 200
#: 4× the production round cap — a round is ONE model request and
#: one-or-more tool calls per round are legal.
TOOLS_CAP = 200
#: ≤ the ``tools`` cap (200 tool entries) + ≤ ~50 thinking runs (one per
#: round at the production cap) + margin — the phase-158 "50 matches the
#: tools cap" sizing is retired with the round-cap-10 assumption.
SEGMENTS_CAP = 450
SOURCE_CAP = 120  # documents.source String(120)
PATH_CAP = 1000  # documents.path String(1000)
TITLE_CAP = 500  # documents.title String(500)
NAME_CAP = 100  # ToolCall.name
ARGUMENT_CAP = 2000  # ToolCall.argument
MESSAGES_CAP = 500  # SavedChatCreate/Update.messages (phase 164: was 200)
HISTORY_CAP = 500  # ChatRequest.history (phase 164: was 100)
QUESTION_CAP = 4_000  # ChatRequest.message — the cap the composer mirrors (phase 104)
#: The phase-164 anonymous-surface bound, imported from the source (not
#: restated) so the schema and the suite cannot drift apart.
TOTAL_BUDGET = SAVED_CHAT_TOTAL_CHARS_BUDGET
#: A realistic full-cap answer length (131 072 output tokens at ~4
#: chars/token) — the payload the whole chain must now carry.
FULL_CAP_ANSWER = 524_300


def _source_ref() -> dict:
    return {"source": "Homelab", "path": "kubernetes.md", "title": "K8s"}


def _tool_call() -> dict:
    # Phase 95 (task 02): the truncation record rides the same entry —
    # the CURRENT full shape (additive fields, defaults for a plain read).
    # Phase 139 (task 02): the read's requested range joins the same
    # entry (additive — None for a plain read, the phase-95 pattern).
    return {
        "name": "read",
        "argument": "Homelab/kubernetes.md",
        "truncated": False,
        "chars_shown": None,
        "chars_total": None,
        "offset": None,
        "limit": None,
    }


def _thinking_segment(text: str = "a thinking run") -> dict:
    """One contiguous thinking run (the phase-158 timeline entry)."""
    return {"kind": "thinking", "text": text}


def _tool_segment(index: int) -> dict:
    """One tool entry in the timeline — the exact ToolCall mirror, the
    phase-146 scope ABSENT (a plain read, the omission serializer)."""
    return {
        "kind": "tool",
        "name": "read",
        "argument": f"Homelab/doc{index}.md",
        "truncated": False,
        "chars_shown": None,
        "chars_total": None,
        "offset": None,
        "limit": None,
    }


def _user_message(text: str = "How did I install k3s?") -> ChatMessage:
    return ChatMessage.model_validate({"who": "user", "text": text})


def _failed_loc(exc: ValidationError, *loc: object) -> None:
    """Assert the first ``ValidationError`` names exactly the given
    field path (``loc`` tuple, e.g. ``("text",)`` or
    ``("messages", 0, "text")``) — the 422 must point at the offender."""
    assert exc.errors()[0]["loc"] == tuple(loc), exc.errors()


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ChatMessage.text / .thinking
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_chat_message_text_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    msg = _user_message("a" * TEXT_CAP)
    assert len(msg.text) == TEXT_CAP


def test_chat_message_text_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        _user_message("a" * (TEXT_CAP + 1))
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "text")


def test_chat_message_thinking_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate({"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "thinking": "t" * TEXT_CAP})
    assert len(msg.thinking or "") == TEXT_CAP


def test_chat_message_thinking_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "thinking": "t" * (TEXT_CAP + 1)}
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "thinking")


def test_chat_message_thinking_none_still_valid() -> None:
    assert _user_message().thinking is None
    assert ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "thinking": None}
    ).thinking is None


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ChatMessage.sources / .related / .suggestions / .tools / .segments — the
# phase-189 list caps (the character caps above keep their phase-83/164
# numbers; these five follow the agent's real round configuration)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_chat_message_sources_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "sources": [_source_ref() for _ in range(SOURCES_CAP)]}
    )
    assert len(msg.sources or []) == SOURCES_CAP


def test_chat_message_sources_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {
                "who": "brain",
                "text": "ok",
                "sources": [_source_ref() for _ in range(SOURCES_CAP + 1)],
            }
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "sources")


def test_chat_message_suggestions_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "suggestions": [f"chip {i}" for i in range(SUGGESTIONS_CAP)]}
    )
    assert len(msg.suggestions or []) == SUGGESTIONS_CAP


def test_chat_message_suggestions_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {
                "who": "brain",
                "text": "ok",
                "suggestions": [f"chip {i}" for i in range(SUGGESTIONS_CAP + 1)],
            }
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "suggestions")


def test_chat_message_suggestion_chip_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "suggestions": ["c" * CHIP_CAP]}
    )
    assert msg.suggestions is not None
    assert len(msg.suggestions[0]) == CHIP_CAP


def test_chat_message_suggestion_chip_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "suggestions": ["c" * (CHIP_CAP + 1)]}
        )
    # the offender is the ITEM (the list itself is well under max_items).
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "suggestions", 0)


def test_chat_message_tools_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "tools": [_tool_call() for _ in range(TOOLS_CAP)]}
    )
    assert len(msg.tools or []) == TOOLS_CAP


def test_chat_message_tools_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "tools": [_tool_call() for _ in range(TOOLS_CAP + 1)]}
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "tools")


def test_chat_message_related_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    """Phase 189 (A1): the related-doc tier carries the SAME
    ``SourceRef``-family cap as ``sources`` (200) — ``related_max_docs``
    is owner-tunable with no upper bound, so the tier must clear the same
    worst case or a long turn 422s its own auto-save."""
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "related": [_source_ref() for _ in range(RELATED_CAP)]}
    )
    assert len(msg.related or []) == RELATED_CAP
    assert RELATED_CAP == SOURCES_CAP  # one SourceRef-family cap


def test_chat_message_related_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {
                "who": "brain",
                "text": "ok",
                "related": [_source_ref() for _ in range(RELATED_CAP + 1)],
            }
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "related")


def test_chat_message_segments_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    """The list cap at the phase-189 number (450): the worst-case turn at
    the production round cap (200 tool entries + ~50 thinking runs) fits
    with margin."""
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {
            "who": "brain",
            "text": "ok",
            "segments": [_thinking_segment() for _ in range(SEGMENTS_CAP)],
        }
    )
    assert len(msg.segments or []) == SEGMENTS_CAP


def test_chat_message_segments_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {
                "who": "brain",
                "text": "ok",
                "segments": [_thinking_segment() for _ in range(SEGMENTS_CAP + 1)],
            }
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "segments")


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ChatRequest.message (the 4,000-char question cap — phase 104, A3)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_chat_request_message_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    """EXACTLY 4,000 chars passes — the cap admits "a code example of a
    few dozen lines" (owner A3) and the composer's maxlength + counter
    mirror this exact boundary (the 4,000/4,000 E2E submit must not
    422)."""
    req = ChatRequest.model_validate({"message": "a" * QUESTION_CAP})
    assert len(req.message) == QUESTION_CAP


def test_chat_request_message_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    """4,001 chars is the 422 the UI now prevents blind: the server cap
    stays the backstop (pre-existing, untouched — this phase only pins
    it at the boundary, phase-83 pattern), naming ``message`` in the
    error loc."""
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatRequest.model_validate({"message": "a" * (QUESTION_CAP + 1)})
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "message")


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# HistoryTurn + ChatRequest.history — the CHAT path of the long-answer
# chain (phase 164, task 01, locked A1). The live 422 this phase fixes:
# a >32k-char brain answer rode back as ``history`` on the NEXT turn and
# rejected it, so the follow-up of any long answer died with
# "[object Object]". Same boundaries as the saved-chat mirror above.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_history_turn_text_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    """600 000 chars — a full-cap answer (≈ 524 300 at
    ``BOR_MAX_OUTPUT_TOKENS=131_072``) flows back as ``history``:
    the exact request shape the browser sends on the turn AFTER a long
    answer."""
    turn = HistoryTurn(who="brain", text="a" * TEXT_CAP)
    assert len(turn.text) == TEXT_CAP
    # And the realistic full-cap answer, not just the boundary value.
    assert len(HistoryTurn(who="brain", text="a" * FULL_CAP_ANSWER).text) == FULL_CAP_ANSWER


def test_history_turn_text_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        HistoryTurn(who="brain", text="a" * (TEXT_CAP + 1))
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "text")


def test_history_turn_thinking_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    turn = HistoryTurn(who="brain", text="ok", thinking="t" * TEXT_CAP)
    assert len(turn.thinking or "") == TEXT_CAP


def test_history_turn_thinking_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        HistoryTurn(who="brain", text="ok", thinking="t" * (TEXT_CAP + 1))
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "thinking")


def test_history_turn_caps_match_the_saved_chat_mirror() -> None:
    """The phase-83 mirror invariant, verified by identical boundaries
    (not by comment): a payload at the cap validates on BOTH models and
    one past it fails on BOTH — ``HistoryTurn`` (the chat path) and
    ``ChatMessage`` (the saved-chat path). Raise one side in
    ``app/schemas.py`` and this pin fails."""
    for length, rejected in ((TEXT_CAP, False), (TEXT_CAP + 1, True)):
        payload = {"who": "brain", "text": "a" * length, "thinking": "t" * length}
        for model in (HistoryTurn, ChatMessage):
            if rejected:
                with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
                    model.model_validate(payload)
            else:
                model.model_validate(payload)


def test_chat_request_history_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    """500 turns pass — the client sends the WHOLE ``bor.chat.v1``
    record minus the current question, so the ceiling is a DoS sanity
    bound only (the config budgets trim for real, locked A4)."""
    req = ChatRequest.model_validate(
        {"message": "hi", "history": [{"who": "user", "text": f"q{i}"} for i in range(HISTORY_CAP)]}
    )
    assert len(req.history) == HISTORY_CAP


def test_chat_request_history_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatRequest.model_validate(
            {
                "message": "hi",
                "history": [
                    {"who": "user", "text": f"q{i}"} for i in range(HISTORY_CAP + 1)
                ],
            }
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "history")


def test_cap_rejection_detail_is_a_list_of_objects() -> None:
    """The server-side half of the phase-164 contract (task 02's input):
    a cap rejection is the pydantic 422 ``detail`` — a LIST OF OBJECTS
    (``loc``/``msg``/``type``), never a plain string. This is exactly the
    shape the client turned into ``[object Object]``; the serializer must
    read ``msg`` and never the ``input`` (which carries the whole
    conversation)."""
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        HistoryTurn(who="brain", text="a" * (TEXT_CAP + 1))
    detail = exc.value.errors()
    assert isinstance(detail, list) and len(detail) == 1
    (entry,) = detail
    assert entry["loc"] == ("text",)
    assert entry["type"] == "string_too_long"
    # The message the UI shows verbatim in the failed-turn note.
    assert entry["msg"] == f"String should have at most {TEXT_CAP} characters"
    # The raw input DOES ride the error object server-side — which is why
    # the client serializer only ever reads ``msg``.
    assert entry["input"].startswith("aaaa")


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# SourceRef (documents column-length mirrors)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_source_ref_source_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    ref = SourceRef.model_validate(
        {"source": "s" * SOURCE_CAP, "path": "a.md", "title": "A"}
    )
    assert len(ref.source) == SOURCE_CAP


def test_source_ref_source_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        SourceRef.model_validate({"source": "s" * (SOURCE_CAP + 1), "path": "a.md", "title": "A"})
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "source")


def test_source_ref_path_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    ref = SourceRef.model_validate(
        {"source": "Homelab", "path": "p" * PATH_CAP, "title": "A"}
    )
    assert len(ref.path) == PATH_CAP


def test_source_ref_path_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        SourceRef.model_validate(
            {"source": "Homelab", "path": "p" * (PATH_CAP + 1), "title": "A"}
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "path")


def test_source_ref_title_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    ref = SourceRef.model_validate(
        {"source": "Homelab", "path": "a.md", "title": "t" * TITLE_CAP}
    )
    assert len(ref.title) == TITLE_CAP


def test_source_ref_title_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        SourceRef.model_validate(
            {"source": "Homelab", "path": "a.md", "title": "t" * (TITLE_CAP + 1)}
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "title")


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ToolCall
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_tool_call_name_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    call = ToolCall.model_validate({"name": "n" * NAME_CAP, "argument": None})
    assert len(call.name) == NAME_CAP


def test_tool_call_name_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ToolCall.model_validate({"name": "n" * (NAME_CAP + 1), "argument": None})
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "name")


def test_tool_call_argument_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    call = ToolCall.model_validate({"name": "read", "argument": "a" * ARGUMENT_CAP})
    assert len(call.argument or "") == ARGUMENT_CAP


def test_tool_call_argument_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ToolCall.model_validate({"name": "read", "argument": "a" * (ARGUMENT_CAP + 1)})
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "argument")


def test_tool_call_argument_none_still_valid() -> None:
    assert ToolCall.model_validate({"name": "ls", "argument": None}).argument is None
    assert ToolCall.model_validate({"name": "ls"}).argument is None


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# SavedChatCreate / SavedChatUpdate .messages
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def _minimal_messages(n: int) -> list[dict]:
    return [{"who": "user" if i % 2 == 0 else "brain", "text": f"m{i}"} for i in range(n)]


def test_saved_chat_create_messages_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    payload = SavedChatCreate.model_validate(
        {"title": "big", "messages": _minimal_messages(MESSAGES_CAP)}
    )
    assert len(payload.messages) == MESSAGES_CAP


def test_saved_chat_create_messages_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        SavedChatCreate.model_validate(
            {"title": "bigger", "messages": _minimal_messages(MESSAGES_CAP + 1)}
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "messages")


def test_saved_chat_update_messages_at_cap_validates() -> None:
    payload = SavedChatUpdate.model_validate({"messages": _minimal_messages(MESSAGES_CAP)})
    assert len(payload.messages) == MESSAGES_CAP


def test_saved_chat_update_messages_one_over_cap_rejects() -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        SavedChatUpdate.model_validate({"messages": _minimal_messages(MESSAGES_CAP + 1)})
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "messages")


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# The phase-164 total-character budget (locked A1) — the ONE new bound on
# the anonymous saved-chat surface. The per-message caps went to 600 000,
# so the LIST is bounded by total characters instead of by an item count
# that a full-cap answer would blow through: 8 000 000 keeps the worst
# case at the order the phase-83 SEC-05 audit accepted (200 × 64k
# ≈ 12.8 MB) while fitting ~15 full-cap answers.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def _full_cap_messages(count: int, *, size: int = FULL_CAP_ANSWER) -> list[dict]:
    """``count`` brain answers at the realistic full-cap length."""
    return [{"who": "brain", "text": "a" * size} for _ in range(count)]


def test_saved_chat_within_total_budget_of_full_cap_answers_validates() -> None:
    """~15 full-cap answers (15 × 524 300 = 7 864 500 chars, the biggest
    whole-count fit under 8 000 000) validate — the budget is a sanity
    bound, not a practical limit on a real conversation."""
    fits = TOTAL_BUDGET // FULL_CAP_ANSWER
    assert fits == 15
    payload = SavedChatCreate.model_validate({"messages": _full_cap_messages(fits)})
    assert len(payload.messages) == fits


def test_saved_chat_over_total_budget_rejects_with_the_budget_message() -> None:
    """One full-cap answer past the fit → ValidationError whose ``msg``
    NAMES the budget (the 422 the anonymous caller sees), on BOTH the
    create and the update model — the same validator on both bodies."""
    over = _full_cap_messages(TOTAL_BUDGET // FULL_CAP_ANSWER + 1)
    for model in (SavedChatCreate, SavedChatUpdate):
        with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
            model.model_validate({"messages": over})
        (error,) = exc.value.errors()
        assert error["loc"] == ()  # a model-level validator, not a field
        assert "8,000,000-character budget" in error["msg"]


def test_saved_chat_one_full_cap_answer_plus_normal_turns_validates() -> None:
    """The realistic case the live report blocked: a saved chat carrying
    ONE 525k-char brain answer alongside ordinary turns."""
    payload = SavedChatCreate.model_validate(
        {
            "messages": [
                {"who": "user", "text": "Write me the whole runbook."},
                {"who": "brain", "text": "a" * 525_000},
                {"who": "user", "text": "And the rollback?"},
                {"who": "brain", "text": "Short rollback."},
            ]
        }
    )
    assert len(payload.messages) == 4


def test_saved_chat_total_budget_counts_thinking() -> None:
    """``thinking`` counts against the budget exactly like ``text`` (the
    history budget's own accounting, mirrored): 15 turns of 280 000 text
    + 280 000 thinking = 8 400 000 REJECTS even though the text alone is
    only 4 200 000 — a text-only accounting would have waved it
    through."""
    turns = 15
    size = 280_000
    assert turns * size <= TOTAL_BUDGET < turns * (size * 2)
    heavy = [
        {"who": "brain", "text": "a" * size, "thinking": "t" * size}
        for _ in range(turns)
    ]
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        SavedChatCreate.model_validate({"messages": heavy})
    assert "8,000,000-character budget" in exc.value.errors()[0]["msg"]
    # One turn fewer fits (14 × 560 000 = 7 840 000).
    assert len(SavedChatCreate.model_validate({"messages": heavy[:-1]}).messages) == 14


def test_saved_chat_at_exactly_the_total_budget_validates() -> None:
    """The boundary is INCLUSIVE: exactly 8 000 000 characters across the
    messages passes (13 at the 600 000 cap + one of 200 000), one
    character more rejects."""

    def _conversation(last_size: int) -> list[dict]:
        return [{"who": "brain", "text": "a" * TEXT_CAP} for _ in range(13)] + [
            {"who": "brain", "text": "b" * last_size}
        ]

    at = SavedChatCreate.model_validate({"messages": _conversation(200_000)})
    assert sum(len(m.text) for m in at.messages) == TOTAL_BUDGET
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        SavedChatCreate.model_validate({"messages": _conversation(200_001)})
    assert "8,000,000-character budget" in exc.value.errors()[0]["msg"]


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# JSON-shape regression: same KEYS as before, value bounds only
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_extra_keys_still_forbidden() -> None:
    """``extra="forbid"`` is untouched — a stray key is still a 422-shaped
    rejection (the accepted/rejected KEYS did not change with phase 83)."""
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate({"who": "user", "text": "hi", "html": "<b>x</b>"})
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "html")


def test_minimal_message_still_validates() -> None:
    """Optional keys may be ABSENT exactly as pre-phase-83."""
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate({"who": "user", "text": "hi"})
    assert (
        msg.sources,
        msg.related,
        msg.deflected,
        msg.suggestions,
        msg.thinking,
        msg.tools,
        msg.stopped,
        msg.failed,
        msg.error,
    ) == (
        None,
        None,
        None,
        None,
        None,
        None,
        None,
        None,
        None,
    )


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Realistic-payload round-trip (the stored-shape contract)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_realistic_bor_chat_v1_payload_round_trips() -> None:
    """A full ``bor.chat.v1``-shaped record (4–8 messages mixing
    user/brain, one brain message with ``thinking`` + ``tools`` +
    ``sources``, one with ``suggestions`` + ``stopped``) validates
    cleanly and ``model_dump()`` of the messages equals the input dict —
    ``None``-keys preserved (the phase-50/51 byte-identical stored shape;
    the caps added value bounds only, no key/shape change)."""
    messages: list[dict] = [
        {
            "who": "user",
            "text": "How did I install k3s on the new node?",
            "sources": None,
            "related": None,
            "deflected": None,
            "suggestions": None,
            "thinking": None,
            "tools": None,
            "stopped": None,
            "failed": None,
            "error": None,
            "budget_exhausted": None,
        },
        {
            "who": "brain",
            "text": "Your k3s cluster runs on three nodes — here's how it happened.",
            "sources": [
                {"source": "Homelab", "path": "kubernetes.md", "title": "Kubernetes Cluster"},
                {"source": "Deployments", "path": "k3s-install.md", "title": "k3s Install Notes"},
            ],
            # Phase 113 related-doc tier — an ACCEPTED key (the phase-113
            # omission of this field made extra="forbid" 422 every
            # done-time auto-save carrying it, so grounded turns' brain
            # messages never persisted — the A2 quiet failure swallowed
            # the 422). Round-trips like sources.
            "related": [
                {"source": "Homelab", "path": "traefik.md", "title": "Traefik Notes"}
            ],
            "deflected": False,
            "suggestions": None,
            "thinking": "The kubernetes doc covers the cluster layout…",
            "tools": [
                # Phase 95 (task 02): the current full shape — one
                # truncated read (the marker record) + a plain ls.
                # Phase 139 (task 02): the truncated read is a RANGE
                # read — the requested offset/limit ride the same entry
                # so a save → restore re-renders the "(lines 42–71)"
                # suffix; the ls carries no range (None, as serialized).
                {
                    "name": "read",
                    "argument": "Homelab/kubernetes.md",
                    "truncated": True,
                    "chars_shown": 128_000,
                    "chars_total": 204_000,
                    "offset": 42,
                    "limit": 30,
                },
                {
                    "name": "ls",
                    "argument": None,
                    "truncated": False,
                    "chars_shown": None,
                    "chars_total": None,
                    "offset": None,
                    "limit": None,
                },
            ],
            "stopped": None,
            "failed": None,
            "error": None,
            "budget_exhausted": None,
        },
        {
            "who": "user",
            "text": "And what ports does Traefik expose?",
            "sources": None,
            "related": None,
            "deflected": None,
            "suggestions": None,
            "thinking": None,
            "tools": None,
            "stopped": None,
            "failed": None,
            "error": None,
            "budget_exhausted": None,
        },
        {
            "who": "brain",
            "text": "Traefik exposes 80/443 on every node.",
            "sources": None,
            "related": None,
            "deflected": None,
            "suggestions": ["What is the Traefik dashboard password?"],
            "thinking": None,
            "tools": None,
            "stopped": True,  # the owner stopped the generation mid-answer
            "failed": None,
            "error": None,
            "budget_exhausted": None,
        },
    ]

    payload = SavedChatCreate.model_validate({"title": "k3s install", "messages": messages})

    dumped = payload.model_dump()
    # the stored shape is byte-identical: every message dict — None-keys
    # and all — round-trips unchanged (and the top-level record keeps its
    # ``share`` default). The phase-160 additive ``budget_exhausted``
    # marker joins as an explicit null (the phase-120 ``failed`` /
    # phase-48 ``stopped`` style — ``None`` flows as null, the
    # phase-50 byte-identical contract covers the new key).
    assert dumped["messages"] == messages
    assert dumped["share"] is False


def test_incident_long_turn_payload_round_trips() -> None:
    """Phase 189 (task 01, owner incident 2026-10-16) EXTENDS the
    realistic-payload family with the shape that actually broke: one long
    research turn's brain record carrying 22 ``sources`` (the cited tier
    is the agent's READ docs since phase 119), 33 ``tools`` and 40
    ``segments`` (the 33 tool entries + one thinking entry per contiguous
    thinking run — 7 runs). At the pre-phase caps (``sources`` 20,
    ``tools``/``segments`` 50) this record 422'd its own done-time
    auto-save, the phase-55 A2 quiet contract swallowed the failure, and
    the shared row kept ONLY the question. It now validates and
    ``model_dump()``s byte-identically — the omission rules untouched (the
    tool entries carry no ``path`` key, so none comes back)."""
    sources = [
        {"source": "Homelab", "path": f"notes/doc{i}.md", "title": f"Doc {i}"}
        for i in range(22)
    ]
    # 33 tool entries interleaved with 7 thinking runs (buildSegments'
    # chronological shape: one thinking entry per contiguous run).
    segments: list[dict] = []
    tools: list[dict] = []
    for run in range(7):
        segments.append(_thinking_segment(f"thinking run {run}"))
        for _ in range(5 if run < 3 else 4):  # 3*5 + 4*4 = 31 + 2 = 33
            segments.append(_tool_segment(len(tools)))
            tools.append(_tool_call())
    while len(tools) < 33:  # the last run's remaining calls
        segments.append(_tool_segment(len(tools)))
        tools.append(_tool_call())
    assert len(sources) == 22 and len(tools) == 33 and len(segments) == 40
    assert sum(1 for s in segments if s["kind"] == "thinking") == 7

    record = {
        "who": "brain",
        "text": "The whole investigation, across 22 documents.",
        "sources": sources,
        "related": sources[:2],
        "deflected": False,
        "suggestions": [f"Show doc {i}" for i in range(5)],
        "thinking": "".join(f"run {r} " for r in range(7)),
        "tools": tools,
        "segments": segments,
        "stopped": None,
        "failed": None,
        "error": None,
        "budget_exhausted": None,
    }

    saved = SavedChatCreate.model_validate(
        {"title": "long research turn", "messages": [record]}
    )
    dumped = saved.model_dump()["messages"][0]
    assert dumped["sources"] == sources
    assert dumped["tools"] == tools
    assert dumped["segments"] == segments
    # Every entry round-trips through the discriminated union unchanged,
    # and the scoped-grep key stays ABSENT (never null) on the plain reads.
    assert all("path" not in s for s in dumped["segments"] if s["kind"] == "tool")
    assert ChatMessage.model_validate(record).model_dump() == dumped


def test_realistic_payload_round_trips_through_update_model() -> None:
    """Same record re-Saved through ``SavedChatUpdate`` (the re-Save
    upsert surface) — identical stored shape."""
    msg = {
        "who": "brain",
        "text": "answer",
        "sources": [_source_ref()],
        "related": None,
        "deflected": None,
        "suggestions": ["follow-up?"],
        "thinking": "scratchpad",
        "tools": [_tool_call()],
        "stopped": None,
        "failed": None,
        "error": None,
        "budget_exhausted": None,
    }
    payload = SavedChatUpdate.model_validate({"messages": [msg]})
    # Identical stored shape (the phase-160 additive ``budget_exhausted``
    # marker rides as an explicit null — the phase-120/48 style).
    assert payload.model_dump()["messages"] == [msg]


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Phase 95 (task 02): ToolCall truncation fields + ChatToolResultEvent
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_tool_call_round_trips_with_truncation_fields() -> None:
    """The CURRENT full shape (phase 95 task 02 + phase 139 task 02):
    a truncated read's record (``truncated: True`` + the two non-negative
    counts + the additive range fields, absent for a plain read) validates
    and round-trips ``model_dump()`` unchanged — the save payload carries
    it with zero other change (the UI re-renders the marker — and, for a
    range read, the "(lines N–M)" suffix — from it)."""
    raw = {
        "name": "read",
        "argument": "Homelab/big.md",
        "truncated": True,
        "chars_shown": 128_000,
        "chars_total": 204_000,
        "offset": None,
        "limit": None,
    }
    call = ToolCall.model_validate(raw)
    assert call.truncated is True
    assert call.chars_shown == 128_000
    assert call.chars_total == 204_000
    assert call.offset is None and call.limit is None
    assert call.model_dump() == raw


def test_tool_call_range_fields_round_trip() -> None:
    """Phase 139 (task 02): a RANGE read's record (``offset`` +
    ``limit``, the phase-131 wire fields) validates and round-trips
    ``model_dump()`` unchanged — the saved chat's ``tools`` JSONB keeps
    the range, so the chat page's restore path and the shared page
    re-render the "(lines N–M)" suffix from the stored row. Only ONE of
    the two is also a real shape (the model may pass a start without a
    count — the UI's "(from line N)" line)."""
    both = ToolCall.model_validate(
        {"name": "read", "argument": "Homelab/big.md", "offset": 42, "limit": 30}
    )
    assert (both.offset, both.limit) == (42, 30)
    assert both.model_dump() == {
        "name": "read",
        "argument": "Homelab/big.md",
        "truncated": False,
        "chars_shown": None,
        "chars_total": None,
        "offset": 42,
        "limit": 30,
    }
    offset_only = ToolCall.model_validate(
        {"name": "read", "argument": "Homelab/big.md", "offset": 7}
    )
    assert (offset_only.offset, offset_only.limit) == (7, None)
    limit_only = ToolCall.model_validate(
        {"name": "read", "argument": "Homelab/big.md", "limit": 20}
    )
    assert (limit_only.offset, limit_only.limit) == (None, 20)


def test_tool_call_range_fields_reject_zero_or_negative() -> None:
    """Phase 139 (task 02) bounds (the phase-83 philosophy, the UI's
    guard mirrored): a line number is >= 1 (the server's
    ``_whole_line_number`` bound — 0 / negative are not real ranges, and
    the UI never legitimately sends them; the bool exclusion lives on
    the SSE-side guard, where frames are minted)."""
    for bad_offset, bad_limit in ((0, None), (None, 0), (-3, None), (None, -1)):
        with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
            ToolCall.model_validate(
                {
                    "name": "read",
                    "argument": "x",
                    "offset": bad_offset,
                    "limit": bad_limit,
                }
            )


def test_tool_call_old_shape_validates_with_defaults() -> None:
    """Backward-compat (the phase-50 rule): a saved chat written BEFORE
    phase 95 — tool records without the truncation fields — validates
    UNCHANGED: ``truncated`` defaults to False (the marker is absent),
    the counts to None. No migration (``ChatMessage.tools`` is JSON);
    only the dump gains the additive keys with their defaults."""
    old_shape = {"name": "read", "argument": "Homelab/kubernetes.md"}
    call = ToolCall.model_validate(old_shape)
    assert call.truncated is False
    assert call.chars_shown is None
    assert call.chars_total is None
    dumped = call.model_dump()
    assert dumped["name"] == "read" and dumped["argument"] == "Homelab/kubernetes.md"
    assert dumped["truncated"] is False
    assert dumped["chars_shown"] is None and dumped["chars_total"] is None


def test_tool_call_old_shape_message_still_round_trips_as_record() -> None:
    """The record-level backward-compat: a pre-phase-95 brain message
    (old-shape ``tools``) validates inside ``ChatMessage`` and dumps back
    as a VALID record of the same shape (the frontend renders it without
    the marker — ``truncated`` falsy)."""
    old_message = {
        "who": "brain",
        "text": "You've got this!",
        "sources": None,
        "deflected": False,
        "suggestions": None,
        "thinking": None,
        "tools": [
            {"name": "read", "argument": "Homelab/kubernetes.md"},
            {"name": "read_document", "argument": "Homelab/legacy.md"},
        ],
        "stopped": None,
    }
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate(old_message)
    assert all(t.truncated is False for t in (msg.tools or []))
    # Re-validating the dump is a no-op (lossless record round-trip).
    ChatMessage.model_validate(msg.model_dump())


def test_tool_call_counts_reject_negative() -> None:
    """Phase 83 bounds philosophy: the counts are non-negative
    (``ge=0``) — a negative count is not a real record."""
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ToolCall.model_validate(
            {
                "name": "read",
                "argument": "x",
                "truncated": True,
                "chars_shown": -1,
                "chars_total": 5,
            }
        )
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ToolCall.model_validate(
            {
                "name": "read",
                "argument": "x",
                "truncated": True,
                "chars_shown": 5,
                "chars_total": -1,
            }
        )


def test_chat_tool_result_event_shape() -> None:
    """The A15 extension's wire shape (phase 95 task 02): the seventh,
    OPTIONAL SSE event type — ``{type, name, argument, truncated,
    chars_shown, chars_total}`` — with the pinned field order, the
    ``tool_result`` default, ``truncated`` defaulting True (the emission
    trigger), and the non-negative counts."""
    from app.schemas import ChatToolResultEvent

    ev = ChatToolResultEvent(
        name="read",
        argument="docs/big.md",
        truncated=True,
        chars_shown=128_000,
        chars_total=204_000,
    )
    dumped = ev.model_dump()
    assert list(dumped) == [
        "type",
        "name",
        "argument",
        "truncated",
        "chars_shown",
        "chars_total",
    ]
    assert dumped == {
        "type": "tool_result",
        "name": "read",
        "argument": "docs/big.md",
        "truncated": True,
        "chars_shown": 128_000,
        "chars_total": 204_000,
    }
    # The emission trigger defaults: the pump always builds the frame from
    # a piece, so a frame that ever exists carries the truncation truth.
    minimal = ChatToolResultEvent(
        name="read", argument=None, chars_shown=0, chars_total=0
    ).model_dump()
    assert minimal["truncated"] is True


def test_chat_tool_result_event_counts_reject_negative() -> None:
    """The frame's counts are non-negative (``ge=0``), like the record's."""
    from app.schemas import ChatToolResultEvent

    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatToolResultEvent(name="read", argument="x", chars_shown=-1, chars_total=5)
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatToolResultEvent(name="read", argument="x", chars_shown=5, chars_total=-1)


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Phase 158 (task 01): the ChatMessage.segments field — the turn's
# chronological run order (D4/D6, owner direction 2026-10-04): the
# discriminated thinking/tool union (ChatSegment), capped phase-83-style
# (mirrored, not weakened — ToolCall is the shape source), OMITTED when
# absent (the phase-50 byte-identical round-trip contract — ABSENT,
# never null), the extra="forbid" boundary intact around the new key.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_segments_absent_by_default_and_omitted_in_dump() -> None:
    """A record WITHOUT ``segments`` (every pre-phase shape, every
    no-thinking/no-tools turn) validates with ``None`` and dumps
    WITHOUT the key — ABSENT, never ``null`` (the phase-50 round-trip
    contract; the wrap serializer does the dropping on every surface).
    The dump stays byte-identical to the pre-phase shape."""
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate({"who": "brain", "text": "ok"})
    assert msg.segments is None
    dumped = msg.model_dump()
    assert "segments" not in dumped
    # Byte-identical to the pre-phase stored shape: every bor.chat.v1
    # optional key present (null) — the phase-160 additive
    # ``budget_exhausted`` marker included (the phase-120 ``failed`` /
    # phase-48 ``stopped`` style — explicit null where absent) — and
    # the three serializer-popped keys (image / answer_image /
    # segments) absent.
    assert dumped == {
        "who": "brain",
        "text": "ok",
        "sources": None,
        "related": None,
        "deflected": None,
        "suggestions": None,
        "thinking": None,
        "tools": None,
        "stopped": None,
        "failed": None,
        "error": None,
        "budget_exhausted": None,
    }
    # An explicit empty list is a different thing: [] is a value, so it
    # round-trips as [] (present, empty — the pop is None-gated only).
    empty = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "segments": []}
    ).model_dump()
    assert empty["segments"] == []


def test_segments_thinking_entry_round_trips_and_caps() -> None:
    """The thinking entry: ``min_length=1`` (the zero-char run the
    client never stores) + ``max_length=600_000`` (HistoryTurn's cap,
    phase 83) — at the cap validates, one past raises naming the
    offender; a missing ``text`` too."""
    at_cap = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {
            "who": "brain",
            "text": "ok",
            "segments": [{"kind": "thinking", "text": "t" * TEXT_CAP}],
        }
    )
    assert at_cap.segments == [
        ChatThinkingSegment(kind="thinking", text="t" * TEXT_CAP)
    ]
    assert at_cap.model_dump()["segments"] == [
        {"kind": "thinking", "text": "t" * TEXT_CAP}
    ]
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {
                "who": "brain",
                "text": "ok",
                "segments": [{"kind": "thinking", "text": "t" * (TEXT_CAP + 1)}],
            }
        )
    # Pydantic 2.13 names the union variant in the loc — the 422 still
    # points at the offender (segments[0].text).
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "segments", 0, "thinking", "text")
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "segments": [{"kind": "thinking", "text": ""}]}
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "segments", 0, "thinking", "text")
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "segments": [{"kind": "thinking"}]}
        )


def test_segments_tool_entry_mirrors_toolcall_shape() -> None:
    """The tool entry is the EXACT ToolCall field set (mirrored, not
    weakened — phase-37 pair + phase-95 truncation stamp + phase-139
    range + phase-146 scoped path): a full entry round-trips
    byte-for-byte; a NON-scoped entry dumps WITHOUT ``path`` (ABSENT,
    never ``null`` — the ToolCall omission rule mirrored, so a
    ``segments`` entry and the matching ``tools`` entry of the same
    record stay the same data); a scoped one keeps it."""
    full = {
        "kind": "tool",
        "name": "read",
        "argument": "Homelab/kubernetes.md",
        "truncated": True,
        "chars_shown": 128_000,
        "chars_total": 204_000,
        "offset": 42,
        "limit": 30,
        "path": "search_docs/reese-notes.md",
    }
    msg = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "segments": [full]}
    )
    assert msg.model_dump()["segments"] == [full]
    # Round-trip: the dump re-validates and dumps back to itself.
    again = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "segments": msg.model_dump()["segments"]}
    )
    assert again.model_dump() == msg.model_dump()

    unscoped = {
        "kind": "tool",
        "name": "ls",
        "argument": None,
        "truncated": False,
        "chars_shown": None,
        "chars_total": None,
        "offset": None,
        "limit": None,
    }
    dumped = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "segments": [unscoped]}
    ).model_dump()["segments"][0]
    assert "path" not in dumped  # ABSENT, never null
    assert dumped == {
        "kind": "tool",
        "name": "ls",
        "argument": None,
        "truncated": False,
        "chars_shown": None,
        "chars_total": None,
        "offset": None,
        "limit": None,
    }


def test_segments_caps_mirrored_not_weakened() -> None:
    """The ToolCall caps bind on the segment (mirrored, not
    weakened): ``name`` ≤ 100, ``argument`` ≤ 2 000, ``path`` ≤ 2 000,
    ``offset``/``limit`` ≥ 1, and the list cap is the phase-189
    ``SEGMENTS_CAP`` (450) — NOT the ``tools`` cap any more (the two
    separated when the round-cap-10 sizing was retired)."""
    bad: list[dict] = [
        {"kind": "tool", "name": "n" * (NAME_CAP + 1), "argument": None},
        {"kind": "tool", "name": "grep", "argument": "a" * (ARGUMENT_CAP + 1)},
        {"kind": "tool", "name": "grep", "argument": "x", "path": "p" * (ARGUMENT_CAP + 1)},
        {"kind": "tool", "name": "read", "offset": 0},
        {"kind": "tool", "name": "read", "limit": 0},
        {"kind": "tool", "name": "read", "chars_shown": -1},
    ]
    for entry in bad:
        with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
            ChatMessage.model_validate(
                {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "segments": [entry]}
            )
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {
                "who": "brain",
                "text": "ok",
                "segments": [{"kind": "thinking", "text": "x"}] * (SEGMENTS_CAP + 1),
            }
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "segments")


def test_unknown_segment_kind_rejected() -> None:
    """The discriminator (``kind`` = ``"thinking"`` | ``"tool"``): an
    unknown ``kind`` is a ValidationError naming the offending entry —
    nothing outside the union crosses the boundary."""
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {
                "who": "brain",
                "text": "ok",
                "segments": [{"kind": "bogus", "text": "x"}],
            }
        )
    assert exc.value.errors()[0]["loc"][:2] == ("segments", 0), exc.value.errors()
    # A thinking variant without its ``text`` and a tool variant without
    # its ``name`` are both rejected (the required fields are real).
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "ok", "segments": [{"kind": "tool"}]}
        )


def test_extra_top_level_key_still_forbidden_with_segments() -> None:
    """The ``extra="forbid"`` boundary is INTACT around the new key:
    a record with a well-formed ``segments`` AND a stray top-level key
    is still rejected — adding the field changed nothing about which
    keys are accepted (the phase-83 voice)."""
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {
                "who": "brain",
                "text": "ok",
                "html": "<b>x</b>",
                "segments": [{"kind": "thinking", "text": "x"}],
            }
        )
    _failed_loc(exc.value, "html")


def test_segments_alias_is_the_discriminated_union() -> None:
    """``ChatSegment`` is the Annotated discriminated alias (the
    ``_Chip`` precedent, phase 83): the JSON shape is a flat object —
    the discriminator rides as a field, no wrapper."""
    from pydantic import TypeAdapter

    adapter = TypeAdapter(ChatSegment)
    thinking = adapter.validate_python({"kind": "thinking", "text": "x"})
    assert isinstance(thinking, ChatThinkingSegment)
    tool = adapter.validate_python({"kind": "tool", "name": "ls"})
    assert isinstance(tool, ChatToolSegment)


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Phase 182 (task 05): VerbatimBlockRef + the saved record's answer_text
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def _verbatim_block(**overrides: Any) -> dict[str, Any]:
    """One resolved block — the done frame's item shape."""
    block: dict[str, Any] = {
        "source": "Homelab",
        "path": "quadlet/gufo.container",
        "title": "gufo.container",
        "start_line": 3,
        "end_line": 9,
        "total_lines": 21,
        "text": "[Unit]\nDescription=gufo",
        "truncated": False,
        "locator": "Homelab/quadlet/gufo.container#3-9",
    }
    block.update(overrides)
    return block


def test_verbatim_block_ref_round_trips_every_field() -> None:
    """Every field of the frame's item validates and serializes back
    unchanged (the client matches on ``locator`` and renders the
    SERVER's ``text`` + extent, so none of them may be dropped)."""
    block = VerbatimBlockRef.model_validate(_verbatim_block())
    assert block.model_dump() == _verbatim_block()


def test_verbatim_block_ref_carries_the_phase_83_text_cap() -> None:
    """``text`` is capped at the SAME 600 000 as the answer text (so an
    operator raising ``BOR_SHOW_TEXT_MAX_CHARS`` never hits the wire
    limit), and one character past it rejects."""
    assert len(VerbatimBlockRef.model_validate(_verbatim_block(text="x" * 600_000)).text) == (
        600_000
    )
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        VerbatimBlockRef.model_validate(_verbatim_block(text="x" * 600_001))


@pytest.mark.parametrize("field", ["start_line", "end_line", "total_lines"])
def test_verbatim_block_ref_refuses_negative_line_numbers(field: str) -> None:
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        VerbatimBlockRef.model_validate(_verbatim_block(**{field: -1}))


def test_saved_record_answer_text_round_trips_and_stays_optional() -> None:
    """A brain record accepts ``answer_text`` (the phase-113 lesson — the
    done-time auto-save must never 422) and drops the key when it is
    ``None`` or empty (A9: absent, never ``null``, never ``[]``)."""
    with_blocks = ChatMessage.model_validate(
        {"who": "brain", "text": "shown above", "answer_text": [_verbatim_block()]}
    )
    assert with_blocks.model_dump()["answer_text"] == [_verbatim_block()]

    for value in (None, []):
        record = ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "nothing shown", "answer_text": value}
        )
        assert "answer_text" not in record.model_dump()


def test_saved_record_answer_text_list_is_capped() -> None:
    """The list cap (the phase-83 SEC-05 style): 51 blocks reject, 50 fit
    — far past the ``show_text_max_blocks`` default of 5. The cap stays 50
    through phase 189 (it follows ``show_text_max_blocks``, not the round
    count)."""
    blocks = [_verbatim_block(locator=f"Homelab/a{i}.md") for i in range(51)]
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "too many", "answer_text": blocks}
        )
    assert len(
        ChatMessage.model_validate(
            {"who": "brain", "text": "enough", "answer_text": blocks[:50]}
        ).answer_text
        or []
    ) == 50


def test_saved_chat_total_budget_counts_verbatim_block_text() -> None:
    """Phase 182 (task 05): the blocks are a SECOND byte channel on the
    anonymous save surface, so they count against the same
    8 000 000-character total (the SEC-05 invariant) — 15 records whose
    blocks total 8 400 000 reject even though their ``text`` is small."""
    turns = 15
    size = 560_000
    assert turns * size > TOTAL_BUDGET
    heavy = [
        {
            "who": "brain",
            "text": "short",
            "answer_text": [_verbatim_block(text="x" * size)],
        }
        for _ in range(turns)
    ]
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError) as exc:
        SavedChatCreate.model_validate({"messages": heavy})
    assert "8,000,000-character budget" in exc.value.errors()[0]["msg"]
    # 14 × 560 000 = 7 840 000 fits (plus the small text, still inside).
    assert len(SavedChatCreate.model_validate({"messages": heavy[:-1]}).messages) == 14


# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Phase 192 (task 01, A1): ChatVerbatimBlockEvent — the mid-turn twin of the
# done frame's ``answer_text`` item.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------


def test_chat_verbatim_block_event_shape() -> None:
    """The mid-turn frame's wire shape: ``type`` FIRST (the sibling events'
    convention) then the exact :class:`VerbatimBlockRef` field set, the
    ``verbatim_block`` default, ``truncated`` defaulting False (the block was
    not capped), and no ``model_config`` — the phase-95
    :class:`ChatToolResultEvent` convention mirrored: an SSE frame is
    server-built, so unknown keys are ignored rather than forbidden."""
    from app.schemas import ChatVerbatimBlockEvent

    ev = ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block())
    dumped = ev.model_dump()
    assert list(dumped) == ["type", *VerbatimBlockRef.model_fields]
    assert dumped == {"type": "verbatim_block", **_verbatim_block()}
    minimal = ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(
        source="Homelab",
        path="a.md",
        title="a.md",
        start_line=1,
        end_line=1,
        total_lines=1,
        text="one line",
        locator="Homelab/a.md",
    ).model_dump()
    assert minimal["truncated"] is False
    assert minimal["type"] == "verbatim_block"
    # The sibling convention mirrored EXACTLY: an SSE event model declares no
    # ``extra="forbid"`` (the frame is server-built, so an unknown key is
    # ignored rather than rejected — like ``ChatToolResultEvent``).
    from app.schemas import ChatToolResultEvent

    assert ChatVerbatimBlockEvent.model_config.get("extra") is None
    assert ChatToolResultEvent.model_config.get("extra") is None


def test_chat_verbatim_block_event_field_set_matches_the_done_item() -> None:
    """The drift pin: the mid-turn frame carries EXACTLY the done frame's
    item fields (plus ``type``) with the SAME caps — the one client
    (``isVerbatimBlock`` + ``buildVerbatimPanel``) hydrates both from one
    shape, so a field added to :class:`VerbatimBlockRef` without its twin
    here fails this test."""
    from app.schemas import ChatVerbatimBlockEvent

    assert set(ChatVerbatimBlockEvent.model_fields) == set(
        VerbatimBlockRef.model_fields
    ) | {"type"}
    for name, ref_field in VerbatimBlockRef.model_fields.items():
        mine = ChatVerbatimBlockEvent.model_fields[name]
        assert mine.annotation == ref_field.annotation, name
        assert mine.is_required() == ref_field.is_required(), name
        assert mine.metadata == ref_field.metadata, name  # the caps, verbatim

    # The caps fire (the same limits, enforced on this model too).
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block(text="x" * 600_001))
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block(source="s" * 121))
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block(path="p" * 1001))
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block(title="t" * 501))
    with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
        ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block(locator="l" * 2101))
    for field in ("start_line", "end_line", "total_lines"):
        with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
            ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block(**{field: -1}))

    # ``isVerbatimBlock`` (frontend/assets/verbatim.js) needs exactly these
    # three: a non-empty ``source`` string, a non-empty ``path`` string and a
    # ``text`` string — so the mid-turn event is accepted as-is.
    dumped = ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block()).model_dump()
    assert isinstance(dumped["source"], str) and dumped["source"]
    assert isinstance(dumped["path"], str) and dumped["path"]
    assert isinstance(dumped["text"], str)


def test_chat_verbatim_block_event_dump_keys_are_the_client_contract() -> None:
    """Phase 192 (task 03, A4): the key-set pin the ONE panel client leans on.

    ``frontend/assets/verbatim.js`` has no schema of its own: the
    ``isVerbatimBlock`` guard is a shape check and ``buildVerbatimPanel``
    reads the fields by name — so the mid-turn frame is only renderable while its
    ``model_dump()`` key set is EXACTLY :class:`VerbatimBlockRef`'s key set
    plus the ``type`` discriminator. A field added to one model and not the
    other, a rename, or an ``exclude=`` on the dump all fail here (the client
    would silently lose the caption, the extent, or the whole block).
    """
    from app.schemas import ChatVerbatimBlockEvent

    dumped = ChatVerbatimBlockEvent(**_verbatim_block()).model_dump()
    assert set(dumped) == set(VerbatimBlockRef.model_fields) | {"type"}
    # ``type`` FIRST and the ref's fields in declaration order — the sibling
    # SSE events' convention, unchanged by the dump.
    assert list(dumped) == ["type", *VerbatimBlockRef.model_fields]
    # The three keys ``isVerbatimBlock`` cannot live without, plus the keys
    # ``buildVerbatimPanel`` prints (the caption's extent and its open link).
    for key in ("source", "path", "text", "title", "start_line", "end_line",
                "total_lines", "truncated", "locator"):
        assert key in dumped, f"the client reads {key} off both frames"
    # The done item round-trips the SAME keys: the mid-turn frame is a copy of
    # a done item, so the restore/shared hydration needs no second reader.
    assert (
        VerbatimBlockRef.model_validate(
            {k: v for k, v in dumped.items() if k != "type"}
        ).model_dump()
        == {k: v for k, v in dumped.items() if k != "type"}
    )